Pabau fits when
Choose Pabau when you want a broad practice-management replacement spanning records, booking, payments, marketing, inventory, and reporting.
Sourced comparison
RegenFlow vs Pabau
A factual comparison for outpatient clinics choosing between a broad all-in-one practice-management platform and a between-appointment operating layer.
Verification boundary
Current public facts with clinic-fit caveats.
Last verified . Facts can change after that date, and this page does not claim more than the records below support.
Consider RegenFlow when the priority is coordinating scheduling, intake, documentation, billing work, follow-up, and governed AI around the systems and team you already use with published CAD tiers.
Who each option fits
Fit depends on the clinic model, not a blanket winner.
RegenFlow fits when
Consider RegenFlow when the priority is coordinating scheduling, intake, documentation, billing work, follow-up, and governed AI around the systems and team you already use with published CAD tiers.
Side-by-side facts
Current public facts in one table.
| Category | RegenFlow | Pabau |
|---|---|---|
| Primary scope | Clinic operations around the patient visit | All-in-one practice management |
| Published entry | Starter is $35 CAD/month; Basic is $79 CAD/month; full clinic OS plans begin with Growth at $149 CAD/month | Starter is listed at £50/month on the official pricing page; currency and plan details can change |
| Team model | Starter, Basic, Growth, Pro, and multi-site tiers | Plans by users, clients, and locations |
| Availability language | Available now, configured per clinic, or roadmap | Confirm plan inclusions and add-ons on the current order form |
Primary official sources
Use these records for citation, not inference.
Workflow review
Map this comparison against your clinic workflow.
Use the workflow review path to discuss the clinic context, systems in place, and approval boundary with a human before activation decisions are made.